Bah, Humbug: Nassau County Hits New Homebuyers with Massive Fee Hikes

When the Jacksonville Business Journal takes four minutes to explain what’s happening with impact fees in Nassau County, it validates months of concerns raised by NassauFLDOGE: this is not a routine policy adjustment — it’s a major shift with real consequences, and county leadership appears unmoved by the fallout.

The headline facts are stark. Nassau County commissioners approved a phased plan to nearly double impact fees on new homes, invoking “extraordinary circumstances” to justify increases well beyond the 50% threshold allowed under Florida law. For homes over 3,000 square feet, fees jump from $3,721 to $8,529. That’s not trimming around the edges; it’s a wholesale reset of the cost of building in the county.

We have consistently warned that stacking fees without accountability — impact fees on top of rising mobility fees, on top of school impact fees, on top of escalating property taxes — creates a hostile environment for working families, builders, and employers. The JBJ article makes clear this isn’t theoretical. Developers are already “bracing for trouble,” and industry groups openly dispute the county’s claim that Nassau faces anything “extraordinary” compared to other fast-growing Florida counties.

What’s especially troubling is the disconnect. County staff argue that ignoring infrastructure demand would deter projects and job creation — yet developers say the fee structure itself will deter projects and job creation. Residents are told this will protect them from higher property taxes, even as overall housing costs rise and affordability slips further out of reach. Meanwhile, the county presses forward, largely indifferent to whether the math actually works in the real economy.

Our position has been simple and consistent: growth should pay for growth — but only when the numbers are honest, proportional, and transparent. Declaring “extraordinary circumstances” shouldn’t be a convenience clause to fast-track massive increases without clear proof, peer comparisons, or a demonstrated commitment to spending discipline.

The Jacksonville Business Journal didn’t editorialize — it didn’t need to. The facts speak for themselves. Nassau County is choosing higher fees, faster, while brushing aside legitimate concerns from builders and employers who actually create the tax base the county depends on.

DOGE will continue to ask the questions county leadership won’t answer:

  • Where is the detailed, project-by-project justification for these increases?
  • Why are peer counties managing growth without declaring emergencies?
  • And at what point does “planning for growth” become pricing people out of Nassau County altogether?

This is a big deal. Pretending otherwise doesn’t make the consequences go away — it just turns public policy into a loud “Bah, humbug.”

Connect and Share

Sign this petition

6 Signatures (4%)
150 Goal

Reconsideration of the Westside Regional Park Investment

Petition to the Nassau County Board of County Commissioners

Subject: Reconsideration of the Westside Regional Park Investment

 

Dear Commissioners,

 

We, the undersigned residents of Nassau County, respectfully submit this petition regarding the allocation of public funds toward the development of the Westside Regional Park.

 

It would surprise many to learn that 82.7% of all Nassau County Ad Valorem taxes are paid by properties located east of Interstate 95. Yet, the County has programmed $22.86 million into the Westside Regional Park, located 20 miles west of Interstate 95 — a location largely inaccessible to the majority of residents who are funding it.

 

This project spans over 100 acres with an estimated construction cost of $21 million. Although the land was purchased in 2007 for $1.09 million, it has taken 17 years to bring forward a plan, raising additional concerns about the project's long-term viability and true priority.

 

Over 67% of Nassau County’s population lives in the easternmost zip codes of 32034 and 32097, areas where residents would have to travel up to 35 miles to access the park. Research shows that individuals living more than 10 miles away from a park are unlikely to use it regularly, if at all.

 

In short: the taxpayers bearing the largest burden for this project are the least likely to benefit from it.

 

Given these facts, we have serious concerns about whether the Westside Regional Park is the most responsible and equitable use of taxpayer dollars.

We respectfully request the following:

  • A full public reassessment of the Westside Regional Park's location, accessibility, and return on investment.
  • Consideration of alternative investments in parks and recreation facilities that are more geographically equitable and accessible to the majority of Nassau County taxpayers.
  • Greater transparency and opportunity for public input regarding major capital projects moving forward.

We urge you to pause further expenditures on this project until a thorough and transparent review is conducted.

 

It is time for Nassau County to ensure that public funds are invested fairly, wisely, and in ways that serve the entire community — not just a select portion of it.

 

Thank you for your attention to this important matter.

 

We look forward to your leadership and stewardship of our county’s future.


{Your name will be here}

Scroll to Top

Contact Us