Impact Fees, Mobility Fees, and Why Amelia Island Keeps Getting the Short End of the Stick

When Nassau County recently accused residents of spreading “misinformation” (see attached press release below) about impact and mobility fees, it raised an important question:

Why are citizens only being “educated” after they object to massive fee increases?

The County has a full communications and PR apparatus. Yet instead of proactively explaining these fees before unveiling eye-popping increases, officials waited until residents pushed back — then issued a press release framing public concern as confusion.

Let’s clarify the facts — accurately.


Impact Fees and Mobility Fees Are Similar — But Not the Same

Nassau County is correct about one thing: impact fees and mobility fees are related concepts.
They both exist to offset the cost of growth.

But they are calculated differently and — more importantly — applied differently.

Impact Fees

  • Are applied countywide
  • Use the same rate regardless of location
  • Help pay for needed facilities such as:
  • Fire and police
  • Parks
  • Government buildings
  • General infrastructure

Every new home, regardless of where it’s built in Nassau County, pays the same impact fees.


Mobility Fees

Mobility fees are also growth-based — but they are location or zone-specific and calculated based on estimated travel behavior, not just development.

Nassau County has defined three mobility zones:

  1. Zone 1: East of I-95 (includes Fernandina Beach and all of Amelia Island and Yulee)
  2. Zone 2: ENCPA / Wildlight
  3. Zone 3: West of I-95

This distinction matters — a lot.


How Mobility Fees Are Actually Calculated

Mobility fees are based on travel estimates for:

  • Trip counts
  • Trip length
  • Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT)

Every time you leave your house and go somewhere, that’s a trip.

For example:

  • Home → grocery store
  • Grocery store → post office
  • Post office → school pickup
  • School → home

That’s four trips.

Even if those destinations already existed, they still count as trips — and the distance between them matters.

Longer trips = more time on the road = more impact on the transportation network = theoretically more fees needed.


Why Amelia Island Is Fundamentally Different

This is where Nassau County’s one-size-fits-all zoning breaks down and frankly doesn’t work.

On Amelia Island and in Fernandina Beach:

  • Grocery stores, schools, doctors, government offices, restaurants, and services are close together
  • Trip lengths are short
  • The City has a connected roadway grid with parallel streets and multiple route options
  • Most daily trips are completed early — which is why you can famously lie down on Atlantic Avenue after 8:00 p.m. and not get hit by a car

In short:
Vehicle miles traveled on the island are minimal.


Yulee Is Not the Same — Yet It’s Treated the Same

Yulee, which is also in Zone 1, is fundamentally different:

  • Destinations are spread out
  • Trip lengths are longer
  • Vehicle miles traveled accumulate quickly
  • Traffic patterns are heavier and last later into the evening
  • The roadway network is still developing and lacks redundancy

Yet Amelia Island and Yulee are charged the same mobility fee rate.

That means:

Island residents are paying for roadway impacts they don’t create — so growth elsewhere can be accommodated.


The Real Issue: Nassau County Mobility Zones That No Longer Reflect Reality

At this point, it is increasingly clear that:

  • Amelia Island should be its own mobility zone
  • Yulee should be its own mobility zone

Until that happens, island residents will continue to:

  • Pay disproportionately high mobility fees
  • Receive negligible transportation benefit
  • Subsidize infrastructure needed for entirely different development patterns

This isn’t speculation — it’s how the fee formula works.


And One More Question the County Still Hasn’t Answered

If these fees are so fair, lawful, and necessary — why were residents not clearly educated before the increases were proposed?

Why did it take:

  • Public outrage
  • Detailed comparisons
  • Citizen analysis

…for the County to suddenly decide clarification was needed?

A transparent government explains policy before it sends the bill.


Connect and Share

Sign this petition

6 Signatures (4%)
150 Goal

Reconsideration of the Westside Regional Park Investment

Petition to the Nassau County Board of County Commissioners

Subject: Reconsideration of the Westside Regional Park Investment

 

Dear Commissioners,

 

We, the undersigned residents of Nassau County, respectfully submit this petition regarding the allocation of public funds toward the development of the Westside Regional Park.

 

It would surprise many to learn that 82.7% of all Nassau County Ad Valorem taxes are paid by properties located east of Interstate 95. Yet, the County has programmed $22.86 million into the Westside Regional Park, located 20 miles west of Interstate 95 — a location largely inaccessible to the majority of residents who are funding it.

 

This project spans over 100 acres with an estimated construction cost of $21 million. Although the land was purchased in 2007 for $1.09 million, it has taken 17 years to bring forward a plan, raising additional concerns about the project's long-term viability and true priority.

 

Over 67% of Nassau County’s population lives in the easternmost zip codes of 32034 and 32097, areas where residents would have to travel up to 35 miles to access the park. Research shows that individuals living more than 10 miles away from a park are unlikely to use it regularly, if at all.

 

In short: the taxpayers bearing the largest burden for this project are the least likely to benefit from it.

 

Given these facts, we have serious concerns about whether the Westside Regional Park is the most responsible and equitable use of taxpayer dollars.

We respectfully request the following:

  • A full public reassessment of the Westside Regional Park's location, accessibility, and return on investment.
  • Consideration of alternative investments in parks and recreation facilities that are more geographically equitable and accessible to the majority of Nassau County taxpayers.
  • Greater transparency and opportunity for public input regarding major capital projects moving forward.

We urge you to pause further expenditures on this project until a thorough and transparent review is conducted.

 

It is time for Nassau County to ensure that public funds are invested fairly, wisely, and in ways that serve the entire community — not just a select portion of it.

 

Thank you for your attention to this important matter.

 

We look forward to your leadership and stewardship of our county’s future.


{Your name will be here}

Scroll to Top

Contact Us