Is Cherry Picking Nassau’s Strategy?

Why Nassau County Brags About Their Fees Compared to St. Johns — But Hides the Comparison That Really Matters

When local officials want to make themselves look good, they don’t change their policies — they simply change how they compare themselves. That’s exactly what’s happening in Nassau County today.

County leaders have been proudly declaring, “Our Fees are lower than St. Johns County!”

Cute line. Sounds good.

But here’s the truth they leave out:

Nassau County is almost double the cost of Clay County, which is another County in our Metropolitan Statistical Area.

That’s not a rounding error.
That’s not speculative.
That’s not “depending on the zone.”

That’s your money — and it’s a 97% higher cost to build a basic 2,000 sq. ft. single-family home in Nassau than in Clay County.

When the comparison is bad, the County goes quiet.
When the comparison makes them look good, suddenly it’s a press release.

That’s called cherry picking — not transparency.


📉 The Numbers They Don’t Want You to See

2,000 sq. ft. Single-Family Home Fee Load

CategoryClay CountyNassau County
Police$968$1,190
Fire$1,278$1,382
Parks (Total)$1,584$2,831
Admin / Facilities$915$1,919
Mobility Fee*$5,083$11,996
Total Fees$9,828$19,318

Nassau County costs $9,490 more — a 97% increase over Clay County.
Comparison uses the largest mobility fee zone in each county.


One More Thing: These Are Proposed Fees — and There’s Still Time to Stop This Train

Before anyone shrugs and says “Well, that’s just how it is,” remember this:

👉 These numbers reflect the proposed fee increases Nassau County is pushing — not fees that are already locked in.

That means:

  • They can still be challenged.
  • They can still be changed.
  • They can still be stopped.

Once these fees are officially adopted, reversing them becomes nearly impossible.
Right now is the moment taxpayers still have a voice.

And it’s the moment county officials hope you’re not paying attention.


🍒 How the Cherry Picking Works

Here’s the game:

  1. Clay County makes Nassau County look bad.
    So Clay County magically disappears from county presentations.
  2. St. Johns County is more expensive.
    So suddenly Nassau officials talk about St. Johns every chance they get.
  3. Nassau leaders present selective comparisons
    — always picking the one county that helps them sell a narrative instead of telling the truth.

This is what politicians do when the real numbers don’t support their decisions.


💬 A Fair Question for County Leaders

If our fee burden is so reasonable,
why won’t the County compare itself to Clay?

Why won’t they show residents the full picture?
Why are taxpayers forced to discover these numbers on their own?

Because once the public sees that Nassau is nearly twice as expensive as a nearby peer county, the story changes.

Housing affordability changes.
Competitiveness changes.
Future growth strategy changes.

And public trust changes most of all.


🔍 The DOGE Message: Show All the Data — Not Just the Parts You Like

Cherry picking is not transparency.

Residents deserve honest comparisons, not curated talking points.

That’s not leadership.
That’s marketing.

And taxpayers deserve better — especially while these fees are still only proposals and public pressure can still stop them.

Connect and Share

Sign this petition

6 Signatures (4%)
150 Goal

Reconsideration of the Westside Regional Park Investment

Petition to the Nassau County Board of County Commissioners

Subject: Reconsideration of the Westside Regional Park Investment

 

Dear Commissioners,

 

We, the undersigned residents of Nassau County, respectfully submit this petition regarding the allocation of public funds toward the development of the Westside Regional Park.

 

It would surprise many to learn that 82.7% of all Nassau County Ad Valorem taxes are paid by properties located east of Interstate 95. Yet, the County has programmed $22.86 million into the Westside Regional Park, located 20 miles west of Interstate 95 — a location largely inaccessible to the majority of residents who are funding it.

 

This project spans over 100 acres with an estimated construction cost of $21 million. Although the land was purchased in 2007 for $1.09 million, it has taken 17 years to bring forward a plan, raising additional concerns about the project's long-term viability and true priority.

 

Over 67% of Nassau County’s population lives in the easternmost zip codes of 32034 and 32097, areas where residents would have to travel up to 35 miles to access the park. Research shows that individuals living more than 10 miles away from a park are unlikely to use it regularly, if at all.

 

In short: the taxpayers bearing the largest burden for this project are the least likely to benefit from it.

 

Given these facts, we have serious concerns about whether the Westside Regional Park is the most responsible and equitable use of taxpayer dollars.

We respectfully request the following:

  • A full public reassessment of the Westside Regional Park's location, accessibility, and return on investment.
  • Consideration of alternative investments in parks and recreation facilities that are more geographically equitable and accessible to the majority of Nassau County taxpayers.
  • Greater transparency and opportunity for public input regarding major capital projects moving forward.

We urge you to pause further expenditures on this project until a thorough and transparent review is conducted.

 

It is time for Nassau County to ensure that public funds are invested fairly, wisely, and in ways that serve the entire community — not just a select portion of it.

 

Thank you for your attention to this important matter.

 

We look forward to your leadership and stewardship of our county’s future.


{Your name will be here}

Scroll to Top

Contact Us