No Paid Parking? This is Your Time to Speak Up — Again!

The City Commission will hear a presentation on Paid Parking Management for street meters.

This decision could affect residents, local businesses, and visitors in Fernandina Beach. DOGE Defenders should consider attending and speaking during Public Comments to ensure transparency and accountability in how taxpayer dollars are managed.

Suggested Public Comment Questions


Accuracy & Billing: How will the city and One Parking ensure that paying customers are not wrongly ticketed? What is the expected error rate, and how will disputes be handled?


Local Business Impact: What study has been done to measure the impact of street meters on downtown businesses? Will business owners have input on rate structures and enforcement practices?


Transparency:Will monthly reports be made public showing meter utilization rates, ticketing statistics, refunds, and customer complaints?


Contract Terms: What penalties or termination clauses exist if One Parking fails to meet service standards or if error/complaint rates are too high?

Accessibility: How will seniors, veterans, or those without smartphones be accommodated if the meters rely heavily on apps?


Revenue Use: Where will the money collected from these meters go? Will it stay in downtown for maintenance and improvement, or disappear into the general fund?


Cancellation: How much will the City have to pay to remove the meters if this thing is a loser?


Public Trust: One Parking’s record is mixed:
On the Better Business Bureau (BBB): B+ rating, with several complaints, including one unresolved.
On Yelp (brand-wide): 2.6 out of 5 stars from 36 reviews, showing many dissatisfied customers.
On Yelp — West Palm Beach: 2.3 out of 5 stars from 3 reviews.
On Glassdoor: Employees rate the company about 3.5 out of 5 (24 reviews) — moderate at best.
On Indeed: Some employees praise growth opportunities, but many report poor management, low pay, and high stress.
Industry summaries: Praise technology and convenience, but warn of billing disputes, refund problems, and inconsistent service across locations.

Question: Given this track record, what guarantees will Fernandina Beach have that residents and businesses will not face billing disputes, inconsistent service, or customer support failure?


✅ These are just a few questions taxpayers can raise.
📢 Do you have others you think need to be answered?
✊ Good luck, No Paid Parking Signers. This is your time to be heard…again!

Connect and Share

Sign this petition

6 Signatures (4%)
150 Goal

Reconsideration of the Westside Regional Park Investment

Petition to the Nassau County Board of County Commissioners

Subject: Reconsideration of the Westside Regional Park Investment

 

Dear Commissioners,

 

We, the undersigned residents of Nassau County, respectfully submit this petition regarding the allocation of public funds toward the development of the Westside Regional Park.

 

It would surprise many to learn that 82.7% of all Nassau County Ad Valorem taxes are paid by properties located east of Interstate 95. Yet, the County has programmed $22.86 million into the Westside Regional Park, located 20 miles west of Interstate 95 — a location largely inaccessible to the majority of residents who are funding it.

 

This project spans over 100 acres with an estimated construction cost of $21 million. Although the land was purchased in 2007 for $1.09 million, it has taken 17 years to bring forward a plan, raising additional concerns about the project's long-term viability and true priority.

 

Over 67% of Nassau County’s population lives in the easternmost zip codes of 32034 and 32097, areas where residents would have to travel up to 35 miles to access the park. Research shows that individuals living more than 10 miles away from a park are unlikely to use it regularly, if at all.

 

In short: the taxpayers bearing the largest burden for this project are the least likely to benefit from it.

 

Given these facts, we have serious concerns about whether the Westside Regional Park is the most responsible and equitable use of taxpayer dollars.

We respectfully request the following:

  • A full public reassessment of the Westside Regional Park's location, accessibility, and return on investment.
  • Consideration of alternative investments in parks and recreation facilities that are more geographically equitable and accessible to the majority of Nassau County taxpayers.
  • Greater transparency and opportunity for public input regarding major capital projects moving forward.

We urge you to pause further expenditures on this project until a thorough and transparent review is conducted.

 

It is time for Nassau County to ensure that public funds are invested fairly, wisely, and in ways that serve the entire community — not just a select portion of it.

 

Thank you for your attention to this important matter.

 

We look forward to your leadership and stewardship of our county’s future.

{Your name will be here}

Petition Disclaimer & Terms of Signing

By signing this petition, you acknowledge and agree to the following:

  1. Voluntary Participation
    Your signature is submitted voluntarily and represents your personal support for the petition.
  2. Eligibility
    You confirm that you are a resident, taxpayer, or stakeholder in Nassau County, Florida, and are signing in good faith based on your interest in government transparency and fiscal accountability.
  3. Privacy and Use of Information
    The information you provide will be used solely for:
    • Verifying the integrity of the petition,
    • Communicating updates related to this petition or similar civic efforts,
    • Presenting to local government officials or relevant authorities in support of this request.

We will not sell, trade, or misuse your data. Your information may be shared with government officials only as part of the official submission of this petition.

  1. Non-Affiliation
    This petition is organized by Nassau FL DOGE, an informal group of concerned citizens. We are not affiliated with any political party, government agency, or official campaign.
  2. Non-Binding Nature
    This petition is intended to express collective community interest and support. Signing does not create any legal obligation for the signer or the governing body, nor does it imply formal membership or endorsement of any group or agenda.
  3. Accuracy
    By signing, you affirm that the information you provide is accurate to the best of your knowledge.

Scroll to Top

Contact Us