Please note we have updated this article in bold on the first line below. Previously it appeared as if the city owned 50% of the landmass. We have corrected it as noted in line one.
_______________________________________
Did you know the state, the school board, the county, and the city government owns more than 50% of the landmass within the city limits of Fernandina Beach?
That’s right. While residents and businesses pay taxes on every square foot they own… the city sits on a massive chunk of land that produces no tax revenue.
So we have some questions:
- Why does the city need so much land?
- How much of that land is sitting idle?
- How much are we spending each year to maintain it?
- Why isn’t more of it returned to the private sector, where it could generate tax revenue and economic activity?
And more importantly…
- Who’s tracking the true cost of holding all this land?
- Should city government be in the land banking business?
- Why are we paying rising property taxes while the city holds non-producing assets?
- Has anyone calculated the lost opportunity of having over half our land off the tax rolls?
When you combine land the city owns outright with conservation easements, parks, buffer zones, and surplus property — taxpayers are left holding the bag on maintenance, liability, and missed revenue.
Meanwhile…
- What’s the city’s plan for this land?
- Is it being used for public benefit or political agenda?
- Why keep buying more when we can’t take care of what we already own?
And finally…
- If residents are expected to “tighten their belts,” why can’t the city offload unused land and lower our tax burden?
Fernandina Beach needs to answer these questions — before it buys another acre with your money.